Britain

 

The country of Britain is completely controlled by Israel. The country of Britain could literally be a colony of Israel.

-----------------------------------------

Britain is kidnapping people just like their Israeli owners do

"The final member of a robbery gang who shot dead a policewoman in Bradford was jailed for life today as details emerged of a snatch operation in Somalia which brought him back to face a British court.

A judge allowed publication for the first time of a deal which saw the Foreign and Home Offices pay the African state, which has no diplomatic ties with London, to seize 29-year-old Mustaf Jama in the desert two years ago, close to his warlord father's headquarters.

The ambush of Jama's Land Rover by 15 militiamen nearly failed when a pilot, hired to fly the captured gangster to Dubai, tried to back out, thinking that he was caught up in an anti al-Qaida operation which could bring reprisals."

Israel pisses on Britain again, and our craven leaders love it

 

7-09-09

Israel completely controls Britain and the USA. Britons extradited from Israeli colony of USA to face trial in Israeli colony of Britain for something posted on the internet on USA servers

Two men who fled to the US after waging a campaign of hate against Jews and other minority groups were jailed at Leeds crown court today.

Simon Sheppard, 52, was sentenced to four years and 10 months and Stephen Whittle, 42, was given a term of two years and four months after being convicted of a number of race-hate crimes following two lengthy trials.

The sentence included a four-month term for skipping bail after the judge told them they had "run away to avoid the consequences of your actions".

Whittle wrote offensive articles which were published on the internet by Sheppard. The material included grotesque images of murdered Jews alongside cartoons and articles ridiculing ethnic groups.

Judge Rodney Grant told the pair their material was abusive and insulting and had the potential to cause grave social harm.

Sheppard, of Selby, North Yorkshire, who has a previous race-hate conviction, was found guilty of 16 offences, and Whittle, of Preston, Lancashire, was found guilty of five after two trials, which concluded in January this year.

During the first trial last July they skipped bail and sought asylum in California, claiming they were being persecuted for their rightwing views. They were deported back to the UK last month by a US immigration judge.

The original investigation began in 2004 when a leaflet called Tales of the Holohoax which was pushed through the door of a synagogue in Blackpool was traced by police to a post office box in Hull registered to Sheppard.

Police later found a website featuring racially inflammatory material.

Prosecutors said one leaflet suggested Auschwitz was a free holiday camp for Jews provided by the Nazi regime.

Jonathan Sandiford, prosecuting, said: "A constant theme was the Jewish people had made up the story of the Holocaust as a slur on the German people."

Referring to another article by Whittle, the prosecutor added: "He returned to what appears to be a favourite theme: the notion that black people are not as equal as whites. They are sex-crazed, blood-thirsty savages.

"Black people were caricatured as uncivilised primitive savages portrayed as nothing more than murderers and rapists."

The pair claimed they should be acquitted because the articles were posted on a server registered in the US, beyond the reach of UK law.

Adrian Davidson, for Sheppard, said his client came from a "very troubled background" and revealed that his mother had committed suicide.

He had problems with authority, and in particular the police, but was an intelligent man who had a degree in maths.

Linda Turnbull, for Whittle, said her client was shocked at the nature of the articles he had written and had no intention of re-offending.

Adil Khan, head of diversity and community cohesion at Humberside police, said: "This case is groundbreaking. Previously material published on the internet has been argued to have been published by internet servers outside the UK.

"In this case the publication was judged to have occurred when Sheppard and Whittle uploaded the information. This has been a very long journey – one which has been complex and complicated.

"Inciting racial hatred is a crime which seems to occur too regularly. This kind of material will not be tolerated, as this lengthy investigation shows."

7-8-09

Another individual accused of fraud

The US department of justice filed criminal indictments against Sky's founder, Ross Mandell

7-07-09

Every act the British make takes the needs of Israel into account. A new law to prosecute genocide will apply to people living in Britian but people pasing through. The loophole is so Israelis can still visiti Britain without being arrested

New powers to prosecute war criminals living in Britain who have committed atrocities dating back to 1991 were unveiled today by the justice secretary, Jack Straw.

He proposes closing a gap in the law so that prosecutions can go ahead against British nationals and residents accused of genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity.

The changes will not cover people who are "passing through" or on a short visit. Straw said he was looking to see whether it was possible to provide more certainty over who may be considered a British resident.

6-25-09

Jewish school found to be discriminatory. Imagine that

A Jewish school that prioritised applications from children with Jewish mothers discriminated on grounds of race, the Court of Appeal ruled today, in a landmark decision on the admissions criteria used by faith schools.

The ruling follows an appeal brought on behalf of a 12-year-old boy known as M, who was refused admission to JFS, previously known as the Jews' Free School, in Brent, London.

M, a practicing Jew who regularly attends a progressive synagogue, was told he could not be admitted to the school because his mother had converted to Judaism in a procedure not recognised by the Chief Rabbi.

Overturning a previous judgment in favour of the school, the Court of Appeal ruled that a policy determining eligibility based on a person's descent, rather than religious practice, amounted to racial discrimination.

"It appears clear to us… that Jews constitute a racial group defined principally by ethnic origin and additionally by conversion," Lord Justice Sedley said. "To discriminate against a person on the ground that he or someone else either is or is not Jewish is therefore to discriminate against him on racial grounds."

The controversial ruling comes after both the government and the United Synagogue strongly contested the claim that the school's admissions policy was discriminatory, arguing that the criterion was a purely religious and not racial one.

Faith schools are exempted from the law prohibiting discrimination on grounds of religion or belief, to enable them to provide education in line with their religious beliefs.

"Once [a faith school] is oversubscribed, it can lawfully restrict entry to children whom – or whose parents – it regards as sharing the school's faith," the court said. "No school, however, is permitted to discriminate in its admissions policy on racial grounds."

M's legal team applauded the judgment. "We welcome the strong statement by the Court of Appeal that the fundamental right to equality before the law regardless of race applies to the admissions criteria of a faith school," said John Halford, a solicitor at Bindmans who represented M's father, referred to as E.

"It is unlawful for a child's ethnic origins to be used as the criterion for entry to a school. Such a practice is even more unacceptable in the case of a comprehensive school funded by the taxpayer," Halford added.

The ruling was also welcomed by groups supporting the opening up of faith schools. "Anything that prevents discrimination and encourages faith schools to widen the range of pupils they admit is good news," said Rabbi Dr Jonathan Romain, chair of the Accord Coalition, which campaigns on reforming the law on faith schools.

However, some Jewish groups, along with the Chief Rabbi Sir Jonathan Sacks, condemned the ruling, saying that the principles underlying membership of the Jewish faith had "nothing to do with race and everything to do with religion".

"Ethnicity is irrelevant to Jewish identity, according to Jewish law," said Sacks. "I have advised the leadership of JFS, the United Synagogue and the Board of Deputies on behalf of our community that they have my full personal support and encouragement to use the necessary avenues available to them to maintain our historic rights to be true to our faith and a blessing to others regardless of their faith."

The United Synagogue, which provides religious guidance to JFS, warned the ruling would have a "very serious effect on all Jewish schools". JFS said it was "very disappointed" with the court's decision, claiming it would "seriously undermine the Jewish ethos of the school". It confirmed it would seek leave to appeal.

6-23-09

The British National Pary won some seats in Parliament. Israelis controlled Britain is telling them they must employ people they do not want to or they will be sued

In a letter from the Equality and Human Rights Commission, Nick Griffin, the BNP leader, was told that he had less than a month to provide written undertakings that the party would abide by race relations legislation.

John Wadham, legal director of the Commission, said that the watchdog was concerned that the BNP's constitution and membership criteria could be in breach of the law.

Party membership was said by the Commission to be restricted to those with white skin and a small number of other ethnic groups.

In a statement, the watchdog added: "This exclusion is contrary to the Race Relations Act which the party is legally obliged to comply with. The Commission therefore thinks that the BNP may have acted, and be acting, illegally."

6-22-09

Consolidation of Israeli control of Britain. Israeli chosen as speaker of British Parliament

The son of a Jewish taxi driver, Bercow attended Finchley Manorhill,

6-15-09

Judge rules that oil pumped from man's land was not stolen. The man the oil was stolen from is Arabic

At the High Court last year, the multimillionaire owner of Harrods was awarded 9 per cent of the proceeds from the tiny field since 2000 and the same percentage of future income.

Mr Justice Peter Smith made his ruling after he heard that the owners of the wells at Oxted, Surrey, did not tell Mr Fayed what was happening beneath his Barrow Green Court and Barrow Green Farm.

The oil companies had made millions pumping from under his land for 17 years.

But on Monday three judges at the Court of Appeal allowed a challenge by Star Energy and cut Mr Fayed's award of £621,180 plus interest to just £1,000 for past and future trespass.

The case relates to the Palmers Wood Oilfied, where three wells were drilled diagonally and pass under the Oxted Estate at a depth of up to 700 metres.

Mr Fayed sued Star Energy through his company Bocardo, claiming 12.5 per cent of the income from the oil which is owned by the Crown who gave the oil company a licence to extract it.

After the award at the High Court, Star Energy took the case to the Court of Appeal where Lord Justice Aikens said it raised "interesting issues about the rights of landowners in England under whose land there are naturally occurring deposits of petroleum".

He ruled that although Mr Fayed did have ownership of the strata beneath his land and Star Energy had trespassed on it, the drilling caused no damage and did not impinge on any of his rights.

"Bocardo neither owned the oil found beneath its land nor did it have any right to bore, search for or get that oil."

He said Star Energy had committed a technical trespass but had not caused Mr Fayed any loss.

The judge said if there had been a negotiation between the parties before drilling started, any compensation would have been as little as £82.50.

But he said he believed Star would have been more generous to avoid delay or having to litigate and assessed the sum at £1,000.

Production at the site began in October 1990 and initially the wells were producing 9,000 barrels a month but the rate had now reduced to 2,000 barrels.

The total amount extracted by the end of 2007 was about 1,006,000 barrels worth £10 million.

Mr Fayed noticed the oil rig next to his estate in 1992 and instructed solicitors to find out "what actually was occurring".

But they were told by the oil company that it could not reveal whether the bore hole passed under the estate for "reasons of commercial confidentiality".

Mr Justice Peter Smith said in the High Court that he accepted that the oil company was trying to avoid "revealing the true facts namely that drilling was not only taking place under the Oxted Estate, but had already been happening for two years".

"The defendants were... perpetuating a decision not to tell Mr Fayed/Bocardo what was actually happening beneath the Oxted Estate."

It was not until Mr Fayed saw records held at the British Geological Survey in 2006 that he realised the pipelines were beneath his land.

5-21-09

Plot to destroy what is left of Britain almost done. Britain is going to be a third world country.

Ratings agency downgrades outlook for UK economy

Ratings agency Standard & Poor's today downgraded its outlook for the British economy, saying it had grown increasingly worried about the country's ballooning budget deficit. It also warned there was a "one-in-three chance" that Britain's credit rating may be cut.

5-12-09

Israeli Avigdor Lieberman flying in for visit with Israeli David Miliband to give him his new orders for the foreign policy of Britain.

"Israel's ultra-nationalist foreign minister, Avigdor Lieberman, will arrive in the UK today for a low-key visit, including a meeting with the foreign secretary, David Miliband"

5-08-09

Israeli sex pervert refuses to leave Israeli Safe Haven of Britain

Britain shields criminal Israelis from all over the world. Britain has nothing to sell since it is an island, so they sell criminal protection.

Peter Espinoza, a superior court judge, had refused to consider Polanski's appeal unless he gave himself up to authorities after decades in self-imposed exile. In a short hearing on Thursday, the judge denied the motion for dismissal, because, "Mr Polanski doesn't intend to submit himself to the jurisdiction of the court."

The fugitive director fled the States in 1978 to avoid a jail sentence after pleading guilty to unlawful sexual intercourse with a 13-year-old girl. He has not re-entered the country since then, but has appealed to have the guilty verdict overturned on the basis of alleged misconduct.

Polanski's lawyers allege that the original trial judge, who is now deceased, improperly colluded with prosecutors.

Chad Hummel, Polanski's attorney, argued that his client's presence was not necessary for Mr Espinoza's appeal hearing, claiming, "The misconduct is plainly evident from the existing record".

Polanski, who now lives in France, would have risked arrest if he returned to the United States.

Under California law, a fugitive disentitlement doctrine states that fugitives are not entitled to the processes of the court as long as they remain at large.

Polanski's legal team plan to appeal against the decision.

5-07-09

Another jew involved in crime is let off

If you are jewish in Britain, you can break any law and get away with it.

Mr Abrahams gave money to the Labour via third parties – which is against the strict rules governing political donations.

David Triesman, Matthew Carter and Peter Watt received a total of £600,000 in donations from Mr Abrahams that was not registered to him. But the CPS said today there was "insufficient evidence" to charge them with breaches of electoral law.

The revelation in November 2007 about the donations was a hammer blow to Gordon Brown so soon after the aborted general election that autumn. His popularity has never recovered from that period.

However, he will hope that the CPS decision not to pursue successive Labour treasurers will put the matter to rest.

The 18 month police inquiry is the latest into political donations and has ended the same way, without any charges. The final year of Tony Blair's premiership was overshadowed by the "cash for honours" investigation.

Mr Abrahams was anxious to avoid publicity and used a series of conduits including his secretary and a builder. The property developer was one of the party's biggest backers and gave £670,000 but his identity had been secret.

The proxy arrangement was designed to get around the law requiring political donors to be declared under the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000.

Under electoral laws, political parties have to declare their sources of funding and police have been investigating whether Labour Party staff may have deliberately sought to break the rules.

The scandal led to the resignation of Peter Watt, Labour's General Secretary, who is understood to have been investigated by Scotland Yard detectives.

But the revelation created an outcry that led to the resignation of Peter Watt, then general secretary of the Labour Party, when it emerged he knew of the arrangement.

Scotland Yard was handed over its files to the CPS last June.

Gordon Brown, the Prime Minister, who was not interviewed by police, condemned Labour officials at the time for accepting the money and described the arrangement as "illegal".

The Electoral Commission said: "The law requires that political parties and politicians report the source of donations to ensure transparency and integrity in party funding. This is vital to public confidence in the democratic process.

"In this case, following discussion with the Metropolitan Police Service and the CPS, we referred the matter to the police because there was evidence that an offence may have been committed. The police decided to conduct an investigation, and passed the evidence to the Crown Prosecution Service.

"The CPS has concluded that the donation reports in question incorrectly identified the donor but there is insufficient evidence to charge anyone with any offences.

The decision on whether or not to bring a prosecution is a matter for the CPS."

5-1-09

Britain talks about drugging the water of it's citizens.

The study has prompted calls for further research into the possibility of adding lithium to drinking supplies – like water fluoridation to improve dental health.

Researchers at Oita University in Japan measured natural lithium levels in tap water in 18 communities in the surrounding region of southern Japan.

The lithium levels ranged between 0.7 micrograms per litre and 59 micrograms per litre.

The researchers then calculated the suicide rate in each of the 18 areas. They found that the suicide rate was significantly lower in those areas with the highest levels of lithium in the water.

Writing in the British Journal of Psychiatry, the researchers said: "Our study suggests that very low levels of lithium in drinking water can lower the risk of suicide. Very low levels may possess an anti-suicidal effect."

Lithium is a naturally occurring metal found in variable amounts in food and water. In medicine, very high doses are used to treat bipolar disorder and mood disorders.

But so far the potential benefit of using low levels of lithium to reduce the risk of suicide has not been studied closely.

Professor Allan Young, a Vancouver-based psychiatrist, has described the study as "intriguing".

Professor Young said: "A logical first step would be for the Medical Research Council to convene an expert working party to examine the available evidence and suggest further research.

"Large-scale trials involving the addition of lithium to drinking water supplies may then be feasible, although this would undoubtedly be subject to considerable debate. Following up on these findings will not be straightforward or inexpensive, but the eventual benefits for community mental health may be considerable."

4-30-09

Britain's women are being butchered by Cesarean births. They will all have health problems in the future.

The statistics, from the NHS Information Centre, show that no progress has been made on cutting the number of the operations to the maximum 15 per cent of all births recommended by the World Health Organisation.

The number of women receiving epidurals during labour also increased as well as the number of births being induced, the figures show.

Experts warned that the rate of caesarean section was "too high" and that women needed more information to ensure the procedure was used only as a "last resort".

Belinda Phipps, chief executive of the National Childbirth Trust, said: "The figures out today are concerning and show we are still failing to give a high number of women in England the birth they want and exposing them instead to births that can be physically and emotionally traumatic.

"Evidence shows most women want their labour and birth to be straightforward with minimum intervention provided they feel they can cope, and their baby is healthy.

"Although some women need these interventions, and should be able to get them, these figures appear too high as we know most pregnant women are healthy and at low risk of complications."

She called for more funding for maternity services to ensure one-to-one midwifery care for women in labour.

The Royal College of Midwives warns that an extra 5,000 midwives are needed in England alone to ensure that women get the care necessary in labour.

According to the new figures, more than half of the caesareans performed in 2007/08 were emergency operations.

The overall rate, 24.6 per cent, or 153,406 births, was an increase on the year before, when 24.3 per cent were caesareans.

More than one third of women were given an epidural, spinal or general anaesthetic, 36.5 per cent in total, up from 35.8 per cent the previous year.

The number of births which involved an instrumental delivery increased by 0.6 per cent to 12.1 per cent, or 75,253 deliveries.

Andrew Shennan, professor of obstetrics for baby charity Tommy's, said that although the rise in the rate of caesarean sections had not been as dramatic as in some other parts of the world it was important "that we continue to provide women with all the information and care they need, to ensure that caesarean sections are only used as a last resort".

But ministers insisted there was not a problem.

Ann Keen, the health minister, said: "We have risen to the challenge of an unprecedented rise in the number of births by increasing capacity for maternity and neonatal services with additional investment and staff.

"There are more maternity staff than ever before - over 25,600 midwives, 5,200 obstetricians and gynaecologists, including almost 1,600 consultants.

"Primary care trusts have met our commitment to recruit an additional 1,000 midwives and expect to see 4,000 extra midwives by 2012."

4-20-09

Britain bans Arabs and people who talk about the Israelis in WWII without hesitation.

When the IDF comes to town, they don't do anything

An Israeli Defence Force song-and-dance troupe is to perform in London at a show to commemorate the founding of Israel, provoking anger among groups that campaign for the rights of Palestinians.

The IDF group was likened by the event organisers, the Zionist Federation, to the troupe portrayed in the 1970s BBC comedy It Ain't Half Hot Mum – but not everyone sees the funny side.

Human rights groups accused the IDF of committing war crimes during the three-week invasion of the Gaza Strip, which began in December – allegations denied by the Israeli government – and the army is the subject of a UN investigation.

"This is akin to singing and dancing on the graves of the 400 Palestinian children that the IDF was responsible for killing in January," said Chris Doyle, the director of the Council for Arab-British Understanding.

"We should not be permitting a dance troupe from an army currently under a UN investigation for possible war crimes to be coming to the United Kingdom. It is sick."

The family show, an annual event run by ZF, was due to be held at the Bloomsbury theatre in central London but was moved to a new venue, which is being kept under wraps, after the Bloomsbury pulled out last week on discovering that the IDF troupe was on the bill.

"Obviously we couldn't have them perform here," said a theatre spokeswoman. A number of groups had contacted the Bloomsbury theatre to protest about the show.

Dan Judelson, from Jews for Justice for Palestinians, which claims to be the UK's largest Jewish peace group, described the event as "ghoulish and retrograde".

"The Zionist Federation, with their support for the occupation of Palestinian land, seem massively insensitive to the reactions of most people, who want an equitable settlement for Israelis and Palestinians alike and who will be appalled by the involvement of the IDF in such an event," he said.

Yael Khan, from Islington Friends of Yibna (a Gaza refugee camp), said: "It's grotesque to think that they would invite the Israeli army to perform in London after the massacre in Gaza."

She said protests would be directed to the new venue once it was identified.

A new poster on the ZF website for the event makes no mention of the IDF troupe but a ZF spokesman confirmed it would be performing. He refused to reveal the new location for the event – advertised on the poster as in north London.

"We don't want it spoilt by a group of people who transfer from a climate camp celebration to an animal rights protest to a dance troupe protest," he said.

"How sad that once again a small group of people have politicised an arts and culture event. Freedom of expression has become selective in this country."

4-18-09

Israeli donor to british political party implicated in crime

One of the Liberal Democrats' most generous donors has been accused of accepting tens of millions of pounds in kickbacks from an arms deal between an Israeli company and the Indian government.

Sudhir Choudhrie, who has personally donated £95,000 to the party and whose relatives' companies have donated a further £475,000, was named as a key arms broker in foreign reports.

The allegations have been rejected by Choudhrie, an Indian citizen based in Chelsea, west London. A source close to the family denies that he has ever profited from the arms industry.

This is the second time that Choudhrie, 59, has been accused of being paid an illegal commission from a major arms deal in India. The allegations are said to be politically motivated, and to coincide with the country's general election.

The timing of the allegations is embarrassing for Nick Clegg, the party leader, who called for a curb of the arms trade and a boycott of sales of arms to Israel earlier this year. The claims that one of their donors is an arms broker will concern senior Liberal Democrats, who are still smarting from the exposure of their biggest ever donor, Michael Brown, as a convicted serial fraudster in 2006.

The party may yet be forced by the Electoral Commission to pay back £2.4m it received from Brown's non-trading company, 5th Avenue Partners, and is awaiting the outcome of an inquiry.

The Mumbai-based newspaper DNA has alleged that Choudhrie was paid a share of £80.5m in illegal business charges from the sale of medium-range surface-to-air missiles by an Israeli company to the Indian government.

Payments were supposedly part of a £1.3bn deal struck in January between the Indian defence ministry and the arms company Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI), DNA claimed. The use of middle men to facilitate an arms deal is banned under Indian law. Choudhrie was also named as a key broker between the Israel defence industry and India by the Israeli newspaper Haaretz

Indian police are investigating the deal, according to media reports. The businessman was previously implicated in a police inquiry into kickbacks from another Indian arms deal with the same Israeli company, in 2006, but Choudhrie was not charged with any offence.

An Indian Central Bureau of Investigation inquiry revealed that Choudhrie and his companies "received a number of suspected remittances to the tune of millions of dollars from IAI Israel during the year 1998 to 2001". It suggested that IAI had a close relationship with two of Choudhrie's companies - Magnum International Trading Co and Eureka Sales Corporation.

Sources close to the family believe that Choudhrie is the victim of a campaign to discredit him. "These allegations, as well as the ones from earlier, are completely and utterly unfounded. He has never been involved in arms deals of any sort," said a source.

"He did have a role in Magnum but the company was involved in the export of tea and car parts, while Eureka was involved in building ships in Singapore. The confusion may have arisen because an Israeli company that Magnum once had business links with later became an arms company," he added.

Choudhrie is believed to have moved to Britain in 2002 with his wife and lives in a £4m apartment in Chelsea. He first donated £50,000 to the Lib Dems in August 2006 and has followed this up with payments of £25,000 and £20,000.

Two companies controlled by Choudhrie's son Bhanu and his nephew Dhruv - Alpha Healthcare and C&C Business Solutions - have donated a total of £475,000 to the Lib Dems.

Choudhrie and his son are known to be non domiciled for tax purposes and base many of their business interests in tax havens, where businesses do not have to declare their accounts publicly.

A Lib Dem spokesman declined to comment.

4-18-09

Vote fraud in an attempt to get an Israeli into a political job

An investigation has been instigated in Erith and Thamesmead by Ray Collins, the Labour Party's general secretary. The process of choosing a candidate in the seat had already been the subject of allegations of irregularity.

A London Labour Party spokesman said Saturday's hustings and vote in the southeast London seat had been postponed after it was discovered that the ballot box, which was being stored at the headquarters of the London regional Labour party, had been interfered with.

Georgia Gould, 22, daughter of Tony Blair's former pollster Lord Gould of Brookwood, is the favoured candidate of Labour figures such as Tessa Jowell, the Olympics minister, and Alastair Campbell, the former spin doctor.

Party members in the constituency had been scheduled to select a replacement for John Austin MP for the seat.

Mr Austin wrote to Mr Collins on Friday demanding an investigation into alleged irregularities in the selection process. There is anger among local activities that an "outsider" has been "parachuted in."

Mr Austin said that he had written to the general secretary over alleged rule breaches by campaigners encouraging local members to apply for postal votes. He has also complained that Ms Jowell made a speech in the constituency backing Ms Gould, without informing him, a breach of parliamentary protocol.

"I am concerned about outside people getting intimately involved in the process that should be for Erith and Thamesmead," he said. He was urging the 279 party members to back one of the four local candidates on the women-only shortlist.

Ms Jowell said that she had not breached any rules and had written to Mr Austin on the morning of the meeting at which she spoke, as soon as her attendance was confirmed. "It was not like I was sneaking in to his constituency," she said.

On Friday afternoon a party spokesman said that it had seen "no evidence of wrong doing" in the selection process. However, later the party issued a statement saying; "At 6.45pm it was discovered that the seal on the ballot box containing previously received papers for the selection was broken. In order to maintain the integrity of the process, tomorrow's hustings meeting has been postponed and a new date will be fixed."

Ms Gould was unavailable for comment. There is no suggestion that she was responsible for any of the alleged irregularities.

Another Israeli criminal gets off in Britain. An Israeli can do anything in Britain and will never be prosecuted.

The Director of Public Prosecutions said that the case against Mr Green and Home Office official Christopher Galley, which caused a major political row and raised questions over heavy-handed policing, has been dropped.

The pair were arrested in November in connection with a series of embarrassing leaks of confidential Government papers. Raids on Mr Green's House of Commons office and home caused outrage in Westminster.

Keir Starmer, the DPP, said that the leaks - including information about the pre-Budget report and illegal immigrants working at the Commons - was not secret or influencing national security. He added that it did not expose anyone to risk of injury or death, much of the information was known to people outside the civil service and "moreover some were matters of legitimate public interest".

Mr Starmer concluded that there was insufficient evidence to prosecute Mr Galley for misconduct in public office, and Mr Green for aiding and abetting him and conspiring to cause misconduct in a public office.

A solicitor for Mr Green said that he was "delighted" and urged police to "to learn lessons" from the affair.

Mr Green had said he found his arrest and nine-hour questioning "astonishing" and had always "emphatically" denied any wrongdoing, insisting he was just doing his job.

Home Secretary Jacqui Smith, who originally defended the decision to call in the police, insisting she had no prior knowledge that Mr Green was about to be arrested in connection with the inquiry, now faces renewed pressure.

She said that, in the face of sustained leaks, it had been necessary to prevent further sensitive material being made public.

Scotland Yard launched the inquiry last summer after being contacted by the Cabinet Office.

A report by the Home Affairs Committee said that civil servants exaggerated the damage and threat to national security caused by the leaks as they urged police to launch an investigation.

Mandarins were accused of using "hyperbolic" language in a letter to Scotland Yard which claimed "considerable" damage had already occurred because of some of the leaks.

The Metropolitan Police started an inquiry which led to the arrests, led by the former Assistant Commissioner Bob Quick, who quit last week over a security blunder, and sanctioned by Sir Paul Stephenson, when he was Acting Commisioner.

The report was sympathetic to the Met's handling of the affair.

It said Mr Quick acted correctly in searching the MP's Commons office without a warrant - having being given written permission to do so by the Serjeant at Arms. However it criticised a "Keystone Kops" muddle when officers could not locate Mr Green on the day of his arrest and had to ask David Cameron for help in finding him.

The report also leaves Speaker Michael Martin facing criticism for failing to prevent the police search of Mr Green's office and computers.

His officials gave detectives permission when they could have insisted on a warrant.

The police were called in after Sir David Normington, the Home Office permanent secretary, widened an original leak inquiry and gave permission for the Cabinet Office to write to Scotland Yard after an initial leak inquiry.

The letter, to Mr Bob Quick, even informed him that a copy had been sent to Jonathan Evans, the director general of MI5.

But the report, by the Commons Home Affairs Select Committee, found there was a "clear mismatch" between the sort of material Sir David suspected had been leaked from his department and the claims in the letter to police over the threat to national security.

Sir David told the committee that he had been investigating at least 20 suspected leaks from the Home Office when he decided to refer the matter to the Cabinet Office, which in turn advised the matter be referred to the police, to which he agreed.

The letter to Mr Quick, from Cabinet Office director of security and intelligence Chris Wright, said: "We are in no doubt that there has been considerable damage to national security already as a result of some of these leaks and we are concerned that the potential for future damage is significant."

But in questioning by the committee, Sir David admitted only one of the 20 leaks related to national security and, the report said, that information was known elsewhere in Government, not just the Home Office.

The report said "frustration" by officials may have led them to give "an exaggerated impression of the damage done" and appeared to question whether the police would still have investigated in other circumstances.

It raises fresh questions over the motive for calling in the police, as critics last night accused officials of doing it to "hide their embarrassment" rather than on national security grounds.

The report concluded: "We are concerned that growing frustration in both the Home Office and Cabinet Office may have led officials to give an exaggerated impression of the damage done by the leaks."

It added: "We think it was unhelpful to give the police the impression the Home Office leaker(s) had already caused considerable damage to national security."

Everyone kisses Israeli butt in Britain

Tesco criticised for Israeli goods boycott hotline

Tesco has come under fire from the pro-Israel lobby after setting up a customer helpline option for people to complain about it stocking Israeli products.

A recorded message told callers ringing its general customer services number: "If you are ringing regarding Israeli goods, please press one."

The supermarket said it set up the line, which is no longer available, in anticipation of a high level of calls after the Palestine Solidarity Campaign called for a boycott of Israeli goods and urged its supporters to phone Tesco and Waitrose on 30 March about their stance on selling Israeli and Israeli settlement produce. Tesco insisted it had not meant to cause offence and said it apologised if any had been taken.

Anyone choosing the option, which was designed so customers with other queries would not find the line clogged, would have been put through to specially briefed call centre staff, the chain said.

Jonathan Hoffman, the Zionist Federation co-vice-chair, said Israel had been made a scapegoat, the Jewish Chronicle reported. "The risk is that supermarkets will say it's too much of a problem to stock Israeli goods," he told the newspaper.

A Tesco spokesman said: "We were made aware that a campaign group had asked supporters of its specific cause to call supermarkets. In order that any caller could be directed to an appropriate customer services operator, a call option was added to the usual menu.

"Our only aim was to be helpful, and if we have caused anybody offence unintentionally, we apologise."

He added: "It was not making any political point. There are no plans for Tesco to boycott Israeli goods."

-------------------------------------------------------

The second top law lord in Britain is an Israeli, he misused his office for personal reasons, and he is complaining that the European court is going to take away his and his fellows ability to use their power for personal reasons and control of Britain.

Lord Hoffmann, the second most senior Law Lord, accused the Court of going beyond its jurisdiction and imposing "uniform rules" on states.

He said rulings that had gone against domestic decisions were "teaching grandmothers to suck eggs".

The judge insisted he supported the European Convention on Human Rights but not the institution that applies the law.

In a lecture to fellow judges, published this week, Lord Hoffmann said the European Court, in the French city of Strasbourg, was unable to resist the temptation to "aggrandise its jurisdiction" by laying down a "federal law of Europe".

Lord Hoffmann – who is due to retire shortly – said the court should not be allowed to intervene in the detail of domestic law.

He added that this had led to the court being "overwhelmed" by a growing backlog of 100,000 cases.

Earlier this year the court's president, Jean-Paul Costa, said there was a risk of "saturation" unless measures were agreed to reduce its caseload.

The European Court of Human Rights aims to apply and to protect the civil and political rights of the continent's citizens.

Set up in 1959 in Strasbourg, the court considers cases brought by individuals, organisations and states against the countries bound by the European Convention on Human Rights.

In 1989 Lord Hoffmann had a decision of his overturned by the court, after he controversially ordered freelance journalist Bill Goodwin to reveal the sources of an unpublished article for The Engineer magazine.

South African-born Lord Hoffmann also attracted controversy for his role in the extradition proceedings against General Augusto Pinochet.

The judge had contributed to a decision that the former Chilean dictator could be arrested and extradited for crimes against humanity, without declaring his links to human rights group Amnesty International.

He was serving as an unpaid director of the charity, and his wife Gillian was a long-serving administrative assistant at Amnesty's London office. The case led to an unprecedented setting aside of the original House of Lords judgement.

Israelis who control Britain keep Britain firmly fixated on the past of 60 years ago.

He was a founder member of the SAS, was one of the most decorated officers of the Second World War, and has been hailed as a "legend among fighting men".

The heroism on the battlefield of Major Roy Farran, who died in 2006, earned him a Distinguished Service Order, three Military Crosses, the Croix de Guerre and the American Legion of Merit.

Among other feats, he led a highly successful raid against a German army headquarters in occupied Italy in which senior Reich generals were assassinated and their control over a vital front line thrown into chaos. In a single foray behind the lines in northern France, he led an SAS Jeep squadron which claimed 500 German soldiers killed or wounded, for a loss of just 12 British dead, wounded or taken captive.

But Major Farran's record of service after the war, when he was seconded to the British Section of the Palestine Police, cast a shadow over the rest of his life. He was implicated in the murder of Alexander Rubowitz, a 16-year-old member of the Jewish underground fighting British rule, who was kidnapped in Jerusalem in May 1947 - and was cleared at the time of any involvement in the Jewish teenager's death.

Now, however, his reputation is posthumously at risk again from a fresh investigation into the ugly incident, and friends fear that it may be tarnished for ever by the claim that Major Farran was the killer.

Steve Rambam, a private investigator from New York, has been hired by an unnamed Israeli living in America to reopen the case. He hopes to find Rubowitz's body, so that he can be given a proper burial, and discover more about who was responsible for the boy's murder.

He will soon visit Britain, where he hopes that five surviving members of the Palestine Police whom he has identified as members of the covert units might be willing to "clear their consciences" and reveal the burial place of their alleged victim. "There are people in the UK who have personal knowledge of the operations of these so-called 'snatch squads' because they were participants," Mr Rambam told The Sunday Telegraph.

"They would have been privy to who the local co-conspirators were, and all sorts of other good intelligence information that could lead us to where the body was concealed."

Suspicions of Major Farran's involvement were first raised after his grey trilby hat, with his name written inside, was found near the Jerusalem street corner where witnesses said that Rubowitz was bundled into a car by a man carrying a pistol.

Major Farran commanded one of the police squads, while Rubowitz distributed fliers and posters for Lehi - the Jewish organisation nicknamed "The Stern Gang", which killed and wounded dozens of British officers as part of the campaign to drive Britain from Palestine.

Documents released recently by the Public Records Office appear to implicate Major Farran. A written statement from a more senior officer claims that Major Farran had confessed to having killed the boy during an interrogation, by "bashing his head in with a stone". However, Major Farran was tried for murder in 1947 and was acquitted for lack of evidence, a fact which has led some to accuse the British authorities of a cover-up.

Afterwards, he emigrated to Canada, where he maintained his innocence until his death. His family declined to comment to The Sunday Telegraph but Gerald Green, 80, a close friend who served alongside him in the Palestine Police, said he was innocent and the documents were a deliberate effort, perhaps concocted by a superior officer, to frame him.

"Roy Farran was a lifelong friend, and a murderer he was certainly not," said Mr Green, who now lives in the Cotswolds. "The whole thing was a put-up stunt. He was one of the most highly decorated officers. He was a legend among fighting men. Someone tried to pin something on him to provoke trouble out there."

He added: "I can think of many atrocities committed by Jewish terrorists." He recalled how many of his friends had been killed or badly injured, including one who was paralysed for life. Asked whether Major Farran had a violent temper, Mr Green said: "No, Roy was always very calm."

In October 1947, the entire investigation file was burned by the British authorities in Palestine. Mr Rambam believes this was an officially sanctioned cover-up. But copies of some documents had been already sent to London, where they were kept secret for almost 60 years until being disclosed in 2005.

Immediately after the case against him collapsed, Major Farran returned home to Liverpool. Soon afterwards, a letter bomb sent to his address killed his brother, Rex. This was apparently dispatched by the Lehi, one of the most dangerous groups in the Jewish underground which fought to establish the state of Israel.

When he visits Britain, Mr Rambam hopes to meet surviving members of the so-called "Q" patrols, the secret counter-terrorism force charged with suppressing the Jewish underground.

His client wants to find Rubowitz's body so that the boy can finally be given a proper burial. The documents suggest his corpse was disposed of somewhere along the road between Jerusalem and Jericho.

Rubowitz's murder took place at a time of particular tension between Britain and Palestine's Jews. Shortly after the Second World War, London tried to avoid Arab unrest by stopping Jewish immigration to Palestine, including the arrival of Holocaust survivors. The Jewish uprising intensified, climaxing in 1946 when another underground movement, the Irgun, bombed the King David Hotel in Jerusalem, then Britain's headquarters.

Major Farran's squad was one of two covert units charged with penetrating the Jewish underground. They showed little restraint and public documents suggest they did torture suspects, including Rubowitz.

But Edward Horne, 87, who serves as President of the Palestine Police Old Comrades' Association, said: "It's not the way the British do things, we were not fighting the Gestapo. I was vehemently against the squads, the incident never should have happened."

----------------------------------------------------------

Britain gives back art treasures to Israelis claiming to be the owners.

No other people are given their property back after a war. Just Israelis.

Ministers are preparing to back a new law that would allow museums to restore artwork looted by the Nazis to Holocaust survivors and their descendants.

The Holocaust (stolen art) restitution bill would reverse legislation that bans national museums and galleries, including the British Museum, British Library and National Gallery, from disposing of items in their collections. Ministers have been promising to change the law for a decade and, after attempts to introduce a government bill collapsed, are preparing to support a private members' bill introduced by Andrew Dismore, the Labour MP for Hendon.

"I hope it will close another chapter from the Holocaust," said Dismore. "It means recognising a right that has been denied for decades. I suspect many people would be prepared to allow their artwork to stay in public collections but it's their right to decide what happens to it." The bill gets its second reading on 15 May.

The move has been prompted by a number of cases, including that of Arthur Feldmann and his wife Gisela. When the Germans invaded Czechoslovakia in 1939, the Feldmanns were evicted from their home, leaving a collection of Old Master drawings in Gestapo hands. Arthur died after being tortured by the Nazis in the Spilberk Castle prison in his home city of Brno. Gisela died in Auschwitz.

With the help of the London-based Commission for Looted Art in Europe, Feldmann's descendants proved that four of his drawings had ended up in the British Museum. The museum was prepared to return them to the family but was blocked by a high court judge. Instead the family negotiated a deal, including an ex-gratia payment of £175,000, that allows the drawings to remain in London.

Feldmann's grandson Uri Peled, 66, who lives in Israel, said that although he did not wish to have the items returned, the principle of the bill - allowing the rightful owner to make the decision about what to do with their art - was important.

"I am positive that Britain, a great democracy, will introduce such a law," he said. "We were very pleased to leave the drawings with them [the British Museum] for the memory of our grandfather."

The Commission for Looted Art in Europe has helped to restore more than 3,000 items, including paintings, drawings, silver, books and manuscripts to their rightful owners over the past 10 years. However, experts expect the bill to apply to a relatively small number of items in UK museums. One such item could be Cupid Complaining to Venus, by Lucas Cranach, dated 1525. The painting, now in the National Gallery, was once part of Adolf Hitler's private collection but its ownership between 1909 and 1945 remains a mystery.

The legislation is being drafted to apply to "objects stolen between 1933 and 1945 by the Nazi regime" to avoid bids to repatriate disputed artefacts such as the Parthenon sculptures, Rosetta stone, Benin bronzes and Lewis chessmen.

Christopher Price, deputy chairman of the British Committee for the Reunification of the Parthenon Marbles, said: "It will give us publicity, even if it won't shift the law. It could lead to more discussions about possible legislation on other disputed objects."

Price said the issue was timely because the Greeks are preparing for the official opening in June of a new €129 Acropolis museum to showcase the Parthenon sculptures. The building has space for the pieces removed by Lord Elgin in the 19th century and sold to the British Museum.

The museum said it was the legal owner of the sculptures and there could be no comparison to Nazi loot.

The Department for Culture, Media and Sport said the principle of the bill "is very much accepted ... There will be attempts to broaden it beyond the Nazi era and one has to be aware of that and draft it in such a way that the risk is eliminated."

-----------------------------------

Two British talk show guys compare Michael Jackson to IRA murderers. BBC says it was just a joke.

If Michael Jackson was Jewish, the men insulting him would be fired. Look further in this section for the story about Brand and Ross making comments about a Jewish person. Brand quit from the pressure and Ross was placed on leave.

In Britain you can say anything you want about anybody. Except Jews.

Comedians Steve Punt and Hugh Dennis, on The Now Show, made light of the troubles in Northern Ireland by referring to the pop star and terrorist group as "80s celebrities".

They said: "I can't believe which 80s celebrities I want back less, Michael Jackson or the IRA."

The BBC website later described the programme in similar terms.

It said: "Steve Punt and Hugh Dennis discuss the return to Britain of undesirables from Michael Jackson to the IRA."

The show went out just six days after two British soldiers were killed by the Real IRA in Northern Ireland.

The pop star was said to be angry when he heard about the joke.

A source told the Mirror: "Michael was told about the comments and was appalled. It was a disgusting slur.

"To compare him to cold-blooded murderers is not funny. It's highly offensive."

The BBC received complaints about Friday's Radio 4 show and offended listeners posted messages on internet forums.

Jackson has complained to AEG Live, the promoters of his 50-night UK comeback and they are deciding whether to lodge an official complaint with the BBC.

Earlier this week the website for the O2, the venue for Jackson's shows, crashed in the scramble that gripped fans across the world.

--------------------------------------------------------

Israelis controlling Britain stop the BBC from showing a TV show. Again.

The BBC has declined to broadcast a radio version of Caryl Churchill's controversial new stage play about Israeli history, claiming it needed to remain impartial - the same reason given for declining to air the Gaza emergency appeal.

In a move likely to resurrect the row over the BBC's refusal in January to broadcast the appeal to help the people of Gaza, Radio 4 rejected an unsolicited manuscript of the play, Seven Jewish Children, which recently finished a short run at the Royal Court theatre. BBC sources suggest that a significant factor in the decision was awareness of the controversy stirred by Seven Jewish Children during its theatre run and the fact that the BBC has only recently survived the onslaught of criticism for its refusal to broadcast the Gaza appeal. In an email seen by the Guardian, Radio 4's drama commissioning editor Jeremy Howe said that he and Radio 4 controller Mark Damazer thought Churchill's play was a "brilliant piece".

But Howe wrote: "It is a no, I am afraid. Both Mark [Damazer, Radio 4 controller] and I think it is a brilliant piece, but after discussing it with editorial policy we have decided we cannot run with it on the grounds of impartiality – I think it would be nearly impossible to run a drama that counters Caryl Churchill's view. Having debated long and hard we have decided we can't do Seven Jewish Children."

When asked about the email, the BBC said in a statement: "This play was not commissioned and no indication was given it would be broadcast. After due consideration, we felt it would not work for our audience."

Churchill's 10-minute play consists of seven short scenes in which Israeli adults discuss how they will explain to children, who are never seen on stage, seven key moments in Israeli and Jewish history. This includes the Holocaust, the first Intifada and the present-day bombing of Gaza. According to Churchill, the play explores "the difficulties of explaining violence to children".

In a letter sent to the Daily Telegraph last month a number of prominent British Jews condemned the Royal Court for showing Churchill's play which they said portrayed Israeli parents as "inhuman triumphalists".

Some critics agreed. Christopher Hart in the Sunday Times attacked what he called "the play's ludicrous and utterly predictable lack of even-handedness". However, the Times said the play had "no heroes and villains" and the Guardian's critic Michael Billington said the play "shows theatre's power to heighten consciousness and articulate moral outrage".

------------------------------------------------

Oxford newspaper students forced to step down for jokes about WWII

A mock-up edition of the paper, named Lecher, also included photographs of students superimposed on pornographic images.

One story is said to talk of two students sexually abusing and killing babies while another includes a spoof image of a former editor of the paper dressed in a Ku Klux Klan costume making racially loaded remarks.

A spoof story about a busker whose bagpipe music had annoyed Oxford residents joked that the instrument had been used as a means of torture during the holocaust.

The spoof edition was printed and distributed at an end-of-term meal for volunteers at Cherwell in November last year.

Sian Cox-Brooker, of St Anne's College, and Michael Bennett, of Wadham College, the joint editors this term, both deny being involved in putting the spoof edition together.

But they were forced to step down by Cherwell's publisher, a company called Oxford Student Publications Ltd (OSPL).

In a joint statement to The Times the two students said: "The tone and content of Lecher was clearly intended to be satirical, and was received as such by its intended recipients.

"We were not responsible for the compilation of the edition of Lecher before it was printed last year.

"We understand that satire can be misconstrued, and as this term's editors of Cherwell we apologise for any offence which might have been caused and have now resigned."

OSPL added: "The contents of the document are utterly deplorable, and OSPL condemns it in the strongest possible terms."

It is the latest in a series of embarrassing incidents for Oxford involving jokes which have caused offence.

In December members of the university's under-21 rugby team were ordered to attend a special "cultural diversity" lesson following claims of antisemitism and racism over a dinner billed as a "bring a fit Jew" party while others were photographed blacked up at an African themed dance.

---------------------------------------------------

Israelis controlling Britain allow Israel to break arms export laws

Israeli drones in Gaza may have had British engines, ministers admit

MPs are calling for a full account of arms exports to Israel amid growing concerns that British military equipment was used during the bombardment of Gaza – contrary to Israeli assurances and UK export guidelines.

The government was adamant UK exports were not used in drone aircraft that helped the Israeli air force target missile strikes that killed more than 1,000 people and demolished thousands of homes and other buildings and infrastructure.

Now, however, ministers say they are unsure what equipment was used. Attention has been focused on two critical weapons in Israel's frontline forces: the F16 ground attack fighters and the Hermes 450 drones, which pinpoint the sites for attack.

British arms control officials have admitted they are unable to say whether UK-made aircraft engines were fitted to drones. And ministers say they have been unable to ascertain whether the planes were fitted with the pilots' electronic kit for launching missiles, which was controversially – but legally – sold by BAE Systems to Israel, via the US, in 2002.

MPs on the joint committee currently examining arms controls have expressed their frustration at the lack of information. At a hearing, they also complained that for three months the foreign office had failed to respond to questions about UK equipment in the naval blockade of Gaza last year.

A Labour member of the committee, Richard Burden, who is also chairman of the Britain-Palestine parliamentary group, told the Guardian the government should provide "chapter and verse" on the use of all British arms exports to Israel, including critical components for the F16s.

"It should be possible for the government to establish the end-use of these exports. And if they cannot do that through independent checks, then that suggests that Israel is not a reliable trading partner for arms and components," he said.

He recalled that in 2002 Israel was found to have broken its written assurance that no UK equipment would be used in the occupied territories when it was disclosed that Centurion tanks had been converted by the IDF into armoured personnel carriers.

Describing Israel as a "country of concern", the UK says it refuses to export military goods that can be used for internal repression or external aggression.

The foreign secretary, David Miliband, has twice been challenged on the issue of the engine drones in the Commons since Amnesty International and the Guardian three weeks ago pointed to evidence suggesting engines made by an Israeli-owned factory in Staffordshire had been fitted to the Hermes 450 unmanned aerial vehicle. .

Miliband told MPs who have been calling for an arms embargo the allegations were false. The engine, he said, "was not being used by the IDF but had in fact been for export. I am happy to stick with that."

The Israeli company that imported the engines, Elbit Systems – the owners of the British manufacturers UAV Engines Ltd (UEL) – has denied they were fitted to military drones in Israel, saying they were incorporated into aircraft for export only to third countries.

But at the committee hearing Jane Carpenter, a senior official with the export control section of the business and enterprise department, said that had not been checked. Sitting with Ian Pearson, the responsible business and enterprise minister, Carpenter said: "We cannot categorically confirm that we have physically checked that the engines have been incorporated. We only licensed them to Israel for onward export."

She added that, had the engines stayed in Israel, "that would be a contravention of the licence condition, and that would be an offence".

Pearson explained what checks had been made to allow Miliband to deny the allegations. "My understanding is, we have spoken to this exporter and they have confirmed what we already know from our own database: that while they export UAV engines to Israel, the engines are a particular variant which is not used in Israel but is incorporated into UAVs for onward export. So they would not have been involved in the current conflict."

Pearson also said that the UK government had no clear idea whether the F16s had used the BAE Systems gunsight technology.

Israel is a major exporter of UAVs, and the Hermes 450 has been sold to the US, Singapore and Georgia.

Britain's sensitivity about its military relations with Israel are acute since the Hermes is also the basis for the drone being developed by Elbit and the French company Thales for the £900m Watchkeeper UAV programme for the British army. The UK version, fitted with UEL engines, is due in service next year.

The Hermes programme , like all the Israeli-developed drones, is classified as a state secret; the IDF has refused to confirm or deny reports, which first surfaced during the second Lebanon war in 2006, that they were armed with missiles.

The evidence accumulated by the Guardian and Amnesty from academic and specialist aerospace public sources, as well as from Elbit's website and filings to the US security and exchange commission, suggested that the IDF Hermes had used engines made in the UK. The IDF first acquired these in 1997, three years after UEL Engines was bought by Elbit's drone subsidiary, Silver Arrow.

The authoritative industry journal Jane's Defence Weekly reported at the time: "It is powered by a 52 hp UEL AR-80 1010 rotary engine with propeller." Despite repeated requests, government departments have been unable to say whether they know what engines are used on the IDF's drones.

Oliver Sprague, Amnesty International's UK arms control programme director, said: "Available evidence suggests these drones are powered by UK engines. Until someone from the UK government goes and physically inspects the drones, it's hard to see on what basis they are dismissing these serious allegations."

"Until a robust system of end-use monitoring is in place, the UK will forever be reliant on assurances from other countries, and from arms companies, that British-made equipment is not being used to abuse human rights."

The BBC will not broadcast an aid appeal for Palestine. They broadcast aid appeals for the Congo or just about any other disaster.

But the Israeli controlled British television station the BBC, will not broadcast an aid appeal that the Israelis tell them not to broadcast.

BBC attacked by Ben Bradshaw for refusal to broadcast emergency fund appeal for Gaza

"Government Minister Ben Bradshaw has condemned the BBC for refusing to broadcast an appeal to raise emergency funds for the victims of Israel's attack on Gaza

. Ben Bradshaw urged the BBC to "stand up" to the Israeli authorities and broadcast the appeal.

A former BBC journalist himself, Mr Bradshaw said the broadcasters' decision not to carry the appeal by the Disasters Emergency Committee (DEC) was "inexplicable".

--------------------------------------------

Because Britain is totally controlled by Israel, Israel tests all it's latest social control plans in Britain.